Arms and Armour Virtual Collection
  • Home
  • Galleries by Region
    • Africa
    • The Americas
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Oceania
  • Tour by Object Type
    • Archery
    • Blowpipes and darts
    • Clubs
    • Daos, axes, and polearms
    • Firearms
    • Handfighting
    • Metal Armour
    • Non-metal Armour
    • Shields
    • Spears
    • Swords, knives, and daggers
    • Throwing blades and sticks
  • Tour by Theme
    • A Place in History
    • Defining Gender
    • Form and Function
    • Sacred Weapons
    • The Art of War
    • The Beautiful Warrior
    • Warrior Elites
  • PRM Homepage
Home Home » Europe » Aluminium fighting ring (1911.8.1)
155 353 362 384 376
Aluminium fighting ring (1911.8.1)
Previous Previous
Image 5 of 74  
View full size
Next Next
Image 7 of 74  
166 321 169 153 175 164 162 320 151 180 330 161 326 149 361 363 379 377 152 150 176 182 365 230 369 371 174 374 357 165 154 340 327 179 158 347 337 160 227 342 159 356 183 359 360 339 324 178 170 171 334 335 167 181 148 380 157 177 168 349 172 316 319 163 378 381 370 156

Aluminium fighting ring (1911.8.1) 

FranceFranceAluminium fighting ring from France, Europe. Collected by John Charles Ffoulkes. Given to the Museum in 1911.


Many hand-fighting weapons were also conceived as items of jewellery. This is an aluminium fighting ring, bought in Paris by the weapons scholar C. F. Ffoulkes in 1911. It bears a grotesque or gargoyle face, sticking its tongue out in derision. The contemptuous expression is very appropriate to its function. Gargoyles are a prominent feature of the central Parisian landscape and Notre Dame cathedral is widely considered to host one of the finest collections of gargoyles in Europe.


Aluminium was first extracted in the early 19th century and was classed as a semi-precious metal. Due to its rarity, jewellery was its earliest major application. In the 1880s, the Frenchman Paul Heroult developed a cheap electrolytic method of extracting aluminimum from Bauxite ore. Thereafter, it became more plentiful but retained its modernist and semi-precious associations for some time. Therefore, since this ring was made either in the late 19th or early 20th centuries, it was probably an item of some worth.