Arms and Armour Virtual Collection
  • Home
  • Galleries by Region
    • Africa
    • The Americas
    • Asia
    • Europe
    • Oceania
  • Tour by Object Type
    • Archery
    • Blowpipes and darts
    • Clubs
    • Daos, axes, and polearms
    • Firearms
    • Handfighting
    • Metal Armour
    • Non-metal Armour
    • Shields
    • Spears
    • Swords, knives, and daggers
    • Throwing blades and sticks
  • Tour by Theme
    • A Place in History
    • Defining Gender
    • Form and Function
    • Sacred Weapons
    • The Art of War
    • The Beautiful Warrior
    • Warrior Elites
  • PRM Homepage
Home Home » Americas » US Civil War vest (1884.31.12)
49 368 40 60 46 43 41 341 372 373 55 59 223 57 44 48 61 325 45 53 54 52 50 56 346 47 51
US Civil War vest (1884.31.12)
Previous Previous
Image 27 of 29  
View full size
Next Next
Image 29 of 29  
58

US Civil War vest (1884.31.12) 

USAUSAUS Civil War vest from the USA, Americas. Made by G. & D. Cook & Co., New Haven, Connecticut. Part of the Pitt Rivers Museum Founding Collection. Given to the Museum in 1884.


This blue cloth waistcoat with gold buttons dates to the American Civil War of 1861-65. It is lined with removable steel plates (one is shown in the picture) and so represents one of the earliest forms of bullet-proof vest.


Warrior Elites


This innovative piece of armour was developed in the United States, and worn exclusively by Union forces during the American Civil War (1861-1865). In general, it seems that men on both sides viewed the wearing of body armour as rather cowardly. This meant that armour was, as much as possible, disguised to resemble the normal military uniforms of the day, as can be seen in this example. However, the Confederates regarded the wearing of concealed armour as particularly 'yellow', and so the practice never caught on among the Southern forces.


This example was manufactured by Smith, Cook & Company of New Haven, Connecticut. Clearly taking their inspiration from the steel cuirasses of earlier centuries, these vests were not only rigid and heavy to wear but also provided little defensive value against high-calibre muskets. They were even less effective against the newer rifles with the MiniƩ ball.


What is perhaps more interesting than the actual usefulness of this piece of armour is how it grants an insight into the relationship between rank and wealth, and access to better protection. Vests like these were not standard issue and would have been expensive to buy. During the Civil War, the majority of lower ranks on both sides were obliged to travel on foot, carrying their equipment and supplies on their backs. As a result, even if a soldier did possess such a vest, the need to dispose of heavy and non-essential items in the event of fatigue and so on, meant it was often soon abandoned. Therefore it was only the Union officers, who went on horseback and did not carry their own packs, who could afford the luxury of such a device.